No. 3 (2025)
Articles

Slow, Complex, Dull? Climate Boredom and Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future

Ciarán Kavanagh
Ghent University

Published 2025-04-29

Keywords

  • Science fiction,
  • Climate boredom,
  • Ecocriticism,
  • Embodiment

How to Cite

Kavanagh, C. (2025). Slow, Complex, Dull? Climate Boredom and Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future. Journal of Boredom Studies, (3). Retrieved from https://www.boredomsociety.com/jbs/index.php/journal/article/view/38

Abstract

The article discusses the phenomenon of climate boredom via Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future. Based an embodied understanding of boredom—particularly as a literary effect—I considers the novel’s potential to bore through its slow narration of the politics, economics and administration of global carbon sequestration. I posit that the novel’s willingness to bore arises from and resonates with the ways in which it imagines that climate change might be at least somewhat successfully managed. Furthermore, I argue that this may represent a purposeful shift from cli-fi’s perhaps too familiar spectacularizing of climate change’s effects, and that the often delayed, backgrounded or distanced action of the novel serves to redirect interest to the slow, complex and often dull work of climate change’s solving which, while hardly positive, may be more workable than a paralyzing boredom that can emerge as means of distancing climate change. In analyzing Ministry through boredom, I also seek to establish a connection between the phenomenon of climate boredom and critical discussions of literary slowness and complexity, particularly as they are positioned in relation to imaginings of the Anthropocene. Moreover, I want to interrogate this championing of difficult texts in relation to their ostensible aim, which is to shift, inflame and nuance public consciousness on the issue. This article, then, pays particular attention to the ‘caveat’ reader, the bored reader who puts down the text, and thus attends to boredom also as a risk of slow and complex literature.

References

  1. Abbott, P. H. (2011). Narrativity. In P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid ,and J. Schönert (Eds.), The Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg University. http://lhn.sub.uni-hamburg.de/index.php/Tellability.html
  2. Aidan (2020, August 17). Review of The Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson. Goodreads. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3500748849
  3. Anderson, B. (2023). Boredom and the Politics of Climate Change. Scottish Geographical Journal, 139(1–2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2023.2197869
  4. Angela. (2021, August 7). Review of The Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson. Goodreads. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4136878501
  5. Baroni, R. (2013). Tellability. In P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid, and J. Schönert (Eds.), The Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg University. http://lhn.sub.uni-hamburg.de/index.php/Tellability.html
  6. Bould, M. (2024). In Short, Climate Catastrophe. In SFRA Transitions Conference [Oral presentation]. Tartu, Estonia.
  7. Brady, A. (2020, October 27). A Crucial Collapse in The Ministry for the Future. Chicago Review of Books. https://chireviewofbooks.com/2020/10/27/a-crucial-collapse-in-the-ministry-for-the-future/
  8. Caracciolo, M. (2024). Cosmic Summaries and the Ecological Value of Slow Narratives. In M. Caracciolo and E. Mingazova (Eds.), Slow Narrative Across Media (pp. 181–97). Ohio State University Press.
  9. Caracciolo, M., and Mingazova, E. (2024). Introduction. In M. Caracciolo and E. Mingazova (Eds.), Slow Narrative Across Media (pp. 1–13). Ohio State University Press.
  10. Cathy (2020, October 23). Review of The Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson. Goodreads. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3506072975
  11. César Garro Marín (2021, January 18). Review of The Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson. Goodreads. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3710707949
  12. Clark, T. (2015). Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept. Bloomsbury Academic.
  13. Craps, S. (2023). Guilty Grieving in an Age of Ecocide. parallax, 29(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2024.2302666
  14. Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., and Smilek, D. (2012). The Unengaged Mind: Defining Boredom in Terms of Attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612456044
  15. Eastwood, J. D., and Gorelik, D. (2019). Boredom Is a Feeling of Thinking and a Double-Edged Sword. In J. Ros Velasco (Ed.), Boredom Is in Your Mind (pp. 55–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26395-9_4
  16. Finkielsztein, M. (2021). Boredom and Academic Work. Routledge.
  17. Finkielsztein, M. (2023). The Significance of Boredom: A Literature Review. Journal of Boredom Studies, 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7144313
  18. Gardiner, M. E. (2023). Make the Holocene Great Again! Or, Why Is Climate Change Boring? Journal of Boredom Studies, 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8028125
  19. Gavaler, C., and Johnson, D. (2018). The Genre Effect: A Science Fiction (vs. Realism) Manipulation Decreases Inference Effort, Reading Comprehension, and Perceptions of Literary Merit. Scientific Study of Literature, 7(1), 79–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.04gav
  20. Gordon, L. (2020, November 17). Q&A: Kim Stanley Robinson Bears Witness to Our Climate Futures. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/qa-kim-stanley-robinson/
  21. Heise, U. K. (2008). Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford University Press.
  22. Hogan, C. P. (2003). Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists. Routledge.
  23. Maurer, A. (2024). The Ocean on Fire: Pacific Stories from Nuclear Survivors and Climate Activists. Duke University Press.
  24. Moran, J. (2003). Benjamin and Boredom. Critical Quaterly, 45, 168–181.
  25. Patoine, P.-L. (2022). The Realism of Speculative Fiction: Planetary Polyphony and Scale in Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future. Représentations dans le Monde Anglophone, 2, 141–157. https://dx.doi.org/10.35562/rma.437
  26. Prince, G. (2023). The Undernarrated and the Overnarrated. Style, 57(2), 131–140. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/901161
  27. Robert (2022, October 24). Review of The Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson. Goodreads. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3610727893
  28. Robinson, K. S. (2021). The Ministry for the Future. Orbit.
  29. Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as Exploration. The Modern Language Association.
  30. Seymour, N. (2018). Bad Environmentalism: Irony and Irreverence in the Ecological Age. University of Minnesota Press.
  31. Willemsen, S., and Kiss, M. (2022). Puzzling Stories: The Aesthetic Appeal of Cognitive Challenge in Film, Television and Literature. Berghahn Books.
  32. Zunshine, L. (2006). Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Ohio State University Press.
  33. Zupančič, A. (2024). Disavowal. Polity Press.