Journal of Boredom Studies

No. 2 (2024)
Articles

From Situation-Dependent and Chronic Boredom to Profound Boredom: A Study of Boredom in Georg Büchner’s Woyzeck, Lenz and Leonce und Lena

PDF HTML
  • Julia Köwitz García
Julia Köwitz García
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Published 2024-12-10

Keywords

  • Georg Büchner,
  • Situation-dependent boredom,
  • profound boredom,
  • chronic boredom,
  • dehumanization

How to Cite

Köwitz García, J. (2024). From Situation-Dependent and Chronic Boredom to Profound Boredom: A Study of Boredom in Georg Büchner’s Woyzeck, Lenz and Leonce und Lena. Journal of Boredom Studies, (2). Retrieved from https://www.boredomsociety.com/jbs/index.php/journal/article/view/25

Copyright (c) 2024 Julia Köwitz García

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The present article aims to analyze the traces of situation-dependent and chronic boredom and profound boredom present in a selection of Georg Büchner’s works: Lenz, Leonce und Lena and Woyzeck, examining the implications of this imprint on the nineteenth-century thinking in general, and on Georg Büchner’s thought in particular. Following Josefa Ros Velasco’s research on boredom, not only the transition from situation-dependent and chronic boredom to profound boredom will reflect the impetus of an epoch imbued with a generalized tendency to the dominion of rationalism and over substance and nature, but also the gradual mutation that this deep boredom underwent —until it reached its most maladaptive variant— will turn out to be a symptom of this deep shift in thinking. The dawn of industrialization brought the well-known fragmentation of which Schiller had already warned: the loss of nature and art in favor of science finds its expression in Büchner through the constant allusion to boredom, as well as to the lack of communication that it sparked. Thus, boredom acts, in Büchner’s oeuvre, as a warning against a generalized tendency to dehumanization of man by man. Among all the typologies of boredom analyzed, the particular category of boredom experienced by Woyzeck reveals to be especially interesting, inasmuch as it goes beyond a mere warning to this new hypothetical mindset, insofar as it wields the hope that the dehumanized modern subject still may be able to entrust to himself the maxim of sapere aude.

PDF HTML

References

  1. Arévalo Sánchez, M. (2020). Georg Büchners ‘Leonce und Lena’ und ‘Woyzeck’: Zur Rolle des Grotesken bei der Schilderung gesellschaftlicher Verhältnisse. Annuari de filologia. Literatures contemporànies, 10, 117–147.
  2. Barbalet J. M. (1999). Boredom and Social Meaning. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 631–646.
  3. Beise, A. (2013). Ein Revolutionär und ein Romantiker zugleich. In R. Beil and B. Dedner (Eds.), Georg Büchner. Revolutionär mit Feder und Skalpell (pp. 367–377). Hatje Cantz.
  4. Bench, S. W., and Lench, H. C. (2013). On the Function of Boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3030459
  5. Bergler, E. (1945). On the Disease-Entity Boredom (“Alyosis”) and Its Psychopathology. Psychiatric Quarterly, 19(1), 38–51.
  6. Bieber, I. (1951). Pathological Boredom and Inertia. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 5(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1951.5.2.215
  7. Blumenberg, H. (2006). Beschreibung des Menschen. Suhrkamp.
  8. Büchner, G. (1922). Georg Büchners sämtliche Werke und Briefe. Insel.
  9. Damrad-Frye, R., and Laird, J. D. (1989). The Experience of Boredom: The Role of the Self-Perception of Attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 315–320.
  10. De Chenne, T. K. (1988). Boredom as a Clinical Issue. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 25(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085325
  11. Eke, N. O. (2012a). Büchner und die Zeit. In A. Martin and I. Stauffer (Eds.), Georg Büchner und das 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 11–28). Aisthesis.
  12. Eke, N. O. (2012b) “Komm Leonce, halte mir einen Monolog, ich will zuhören”. Büchners eingestandener Stillstand. In P. Fortmann and M. B. Helfer (Eds.), Commitment and Compassion (Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik 61 (pp. 179–194). Brill.
  13. Elpidorou, A. (2014). The Bright Side of Boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01245
  14. Elpidorou, A. (2015). The Significance of Boredom: A Sartrean Reading. In D. Dahlstrom, A. Elpidorou, and W. Hopp. (Eds.), Philosophy of Mind and Phenomenology: Conceptual and Empirical Approaches (pp. 268–283). Routledge.
  15. Elpidorou, A. (2017). The Good of Boredom. Philosophical Psychology, 31(3), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1346240
  16. Elpidorou, A., and Ros Velasco, J. (2021). Philosophy of Boredom. In Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0419
  17. Fenichel, O. (1951). On the Psychology of Boredom. In D. Rapaport, Organization and Pathology of Thought: Selected Sources (pp. 349–361). Columbia University Press.
  18. Finkielsztein, M. (2023). The Significance of Boredom: A Literature Review. Journal of Boredom Studies, 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7144313
  19. Finkielsztein, M. (2024). The Essence of Boredom: The Definition of Situational Boredom. Journal of Boredom Studies, 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10727142
  20. Fiske, D. W., and Maddi, S. R. (1961). Functions of Varied Experience. The American Journal of Psychology, 76(2), 326–354.
  21. Fortmann, P. (2012). Langeweile, Lebenskarriere und Literatur: Zu einer Figur poetischer Produktivität bei Büchner [Boredom, life career and literature: On a figure of poetic productivity in Büchner]. In P. Fortmann and M. B. Helfer (Eds.), Commitment and Compassion (pp. 161–178). Brill.
  22. Friedrich, G. (2020). »… was von der doppelten Natur«. Zur Ambivalenz des Büchnerschen Naturbegriffs zwischen Daseinsethos und Subjektvernichtung. In B. Dedner, M. Gröbel, and E. Vering (Eds.), Georg Büchner Jahrbuch (vol. 14, pp. 245–254). Walter de Gruyter.
  23. Glück, A. (1985). »Herrschende Ideen«: Die Rolle der Ideologie, Indoktrination und Desorientierung in Georg Büchners Woyzeck. In T. M. Mayer (Ed.), Georg Büchner Jahrbuch (vol. 5, pp. 52–138). Walter de Gruyter.
  24. Gorelik, D., and Eastwood, J. D. (2024). Trait Boredom as a Lack of Agency: A Theoretical Model and a New Assessment Tool. Assessment, 31(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231161780
  25. Greenson, R. R. (1951). Apathetic and Agitated Boredom. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 20, 346– 347.
  26. Greenson, R. R. (1953). On Boredom. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306515300100102
  27. Hamilton, J. A. (1981). Attention, Personality and the Self-Regulation of Mood: Absorbing Interest and Boredom. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 10, 281–315.
  28. Hamilton, J. A. (1983). Development of Interest and Enjoyment in Adolescence: Part II Boredom and Psychopathology. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088720
  29. Hill, A. B, and Perkins, R. E. (1985). Towards a Model of Boredom. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 235–40.
  30. Hof, W. (1970). Pessimistisch-nihilistische Strömungen in der deutschen Literatur vom Sturm und Drang bis zum Jungen Deutschland. M. Niemeyer.
  31. Hofmann, M., and Kanning, J. (2013). Georg Büchner: Epoche - Werk - Wirkung. C. H. Beck.
  32. Jens, W. (1983). Von deutscher Rede. Piper.
  33. Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Kracauer, S. (1995). The Mass Ornament. Harvard University Press.
  35. Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Bar, R. J., and Eastwood, J. D. (2014). Causes of Boredom: The Person, the Situation, or Both? Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.034
  36. Moritz, E. (2022). Geist der Zeit. Walter de Gruyter.
  37. Musolf, P. M. (1986). Parrallelism in Büchner’s «Leonce und Lena». A Tragicomedy of Tautology. The German Quarterly, 59(2), 216–227.
  38. O’Brien, W. (2014). Boredom. Analysis, 74(2), 236–44.
  39. O’Hanlon, J. E. (1981). Boredom: Practical Consequences and a Theory. Acta Psychologies, 49(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(81)90033-0
  40. Previsic Mongelli, B. (2009). Zur Inversion des Subjektbegriffs im medizinisch-literarischen Kontext Georg Büchners. Pandaemonium Germanicum, 14, 15–27.
  41. Ros Velasco, J. (2017). El aburrimiento como presión selectiva en Hans Blumenberg [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid]. Docta Complutense.
  42. Ros Velasco, J. (2021a). El aburrimiento como emoción reactiva y revolucionaria: El caso de Chile. Isegoría, 65, e11. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2021.65.11
  43. Ros Velasco, J. (2021b). Me aburro luego existo. La constitución ontológica de la individualidad desde el aburrimiento. Bajo Palabra, 28, 103–134. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2021.28.005
  44. Ros Velasco, J. (2022). La enfermedad del aburrimiento. Alianza.
  45. Ros Velasco, J. (2023). Contemporary Myths on Boredom. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1183875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1183875
  46. Ros Velasco, J. (2025). The Disease of Boredom. Princeton University Press.
  47. Safranski, R. (2020). Romanticismo: Una odisea del espíritu alemán. Tusquets.
  48. Scherer, K. R. (2014). On the Nature and Function of Emotions: A Component Process Approach. In K. R. Scherer and P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to Emotion (pp. 293–317). Routledge.
  49. Schlegel, F. (1797). Lyceum der schönen Künste. Johann Friedrich Unger.
  50. Todman, M. (2003). Boredom and Psychotic Disorders: Cognitive and Motivational Issues. Psychiatry, 66(2), 146–167.
  51. Toohey, P. (2011). Boredom: A Lively History. Yale University Press.
  52. Valéry, P. (1964). Selected Writings. New Directions.
  53. Vanpaemel, G. (1999). The Organisation of Science in the 19th Century. In P. Marage and G. Wallenborn (Eds.), The Solvay Councils and the Birth of Modern Physics (pp. 55–69). Springer.
  54. Van Tilburg, W. A. P., and Igou, E. R. (2012). On Boredom: Lack of Challenge and Meaning as Distinct Boredom Experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 181–194.
  55. Volgger, J. (2023). Leere Hülle oder perfekt erschaffene Frau? E.T.A. Hoffmanns Der Sandmann im Kontext der Menschmaschine. In D. Brötz (Ed.), Menschenmaschinen/Maschinenmenschen in der Literatur: Golems, Roboter, Androiden und Cyborg als das dritte Geschlecht (pp. 43–58). Innsbruck University Press.
  56. von Grimmelshausen, H. J. C. (2022). Der abenteuerliche Simplicissimus. Reclam.
  57. Westgate, E. C., and Wilson, T. D. (2018). Boring Thoughts and Bored Minds: The MAC Model of Boredom and Cognitive Engagement. Psychological Review, 125(5), 689–713. https://doi.org./10.1037/rev0000097
  58. Yucel, M., and Westgate, E. C. (2021). From Electric Shocks to the Electoral College: How Boredom Steers Moral Behavior. In A. Elpidorou (Ed.), The Moral Psychology of Boredom (pp. 35–56). Rowman & Littlefield.
  59. Zweig, S. (2009). Der Kampf mit dem Dämon. Hölderlin, Kleist, Nietzsche. S. Fischer.